York versus York Master

Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 2472
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:48 am
Location: Downtown Browntown
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 767 times
Contact:

Re: York versus York Master

Post by Doc »

bloke wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 12:29 pm Were it that I were the seller - and someone paid that price to me, I would consider it to be a very good (and not-crazy-at-all) price.😉🤣😂
I thought my 20J for $8750 was a very good price, but much more reasonable.

But, I mean... really... who in their right mind would pay $XX,XXX for a BBb tuba???
looking around.jpg
looking around.jpg (35.59 KiB) Viewed 544 times


Welcome to Browntown!
Home of the Brown Note!
donn
Posts: 1343
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:31 pm
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 169 times

Re: York versus York Master

Post by donn »

It seems to me that a BBb tuba should be worth the most money, because it's the best, but whatever. Maybe more to the point, I wonder what's the highest price a (factory) detachable bell tuba is likely to ever fetch. Not that there's anything wrong with a detachable bell.
User avatar
jtm
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2020 2:51 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
Has thanked: 698 times
Been thanked: 209 times

Re: York versus York Master

Post by jtm »

You can have my 186 with recording bell (and straight bell, too!) for 20% of that. Not quite the same, I guess.
John Morris
This practicing trick actually seems to be working!
playing some old German rotary tubas for free
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19324
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3852 times
Been thanked: 4102 times

Re: York versus York Master

Post by bloke »

donn wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:08 pm It seems to me that a BBb tuba should be worth the most money, because it's the best, but whatever. Maybe more to the point, I wonder what's the highest price a (factory) detachable bell tuba is likely to ever fetch. Not that there's anything wrong with a detachable bell.


I do not disagree with your post in any way.

The things that typically cause C tubas to cost more (as we already know) are 5th rotors and lower production numbers...
...yet they are in somewhat heavy demand, as the parents of 17-year-olds buy “C tubas for kolij”, as their “extraordinarily talented” charges managed to make it into the back-ends of their local #2 honor bands, when in the 12th grade.

I view both my C tuba and my E-flat tuba as “fake” B-flat tubas, as both were clearly engineered to (as much as possible) mimic the sonic characteristics of large B-flat tubas as much as could be managed by their designers...
The “monster“ E-flat tubas - of the early 20th century - were designed for the very same purpose. (yes?)
My C instrument‘s advantage is that it responds a bit quicker - and with a bit more easily-accessible facility - than would an exact-equivalent B-flat, and the same with the E flat - except more so.
The “better for sharp keys/better for flat keys“ arguments/excuses are nonsense.

As more C instruments are designed from scratch - rather than being defacto factory cut-downs of B-flat models - intonation characteristics are improving with some newer models…but not with others (obviously: depending on the aural sensitivity of the design engineers, and/or a manufacturer’s willingness to - simply - “go with“ something that - in reality – is a failed design)...but a near-exact C equivalent of a B-flat is always going to resonate a little bit more - well... - “hollow“.

I might even go so far as to suggest that professional-grade 3/4-size B-flat and C tubas tend to serve some of their owners as “fake F tubas”...Back when I owned a model 184, that’s certainly how I used it. 😶

🤣😂😅
How’s THAT for a nice long post for all sorts of people to find all sorts of things with which they can disagree and argue?
It nearly qualifies as a troll, yes? Are “simply—stated truths”, often, the most well-executed trolls, anyway?
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 2472
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:48 am
Location: Downtown Browntown
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 767 times
Contact:

Re: York versus York Master

Post by Doc »

bloke wrote: Tue Jan 26, 2021 7:57 am
donn wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:08 pm It seems to me that a BBb tuba should be worth the most money, because it's the best, but whatever. Maybe more to the point, I wonder what's the highest price a (factory) detachable bell tuba is likely to ever fetch. Not that there's anything wrong with a detachable bell.


I do not disagree with your post in any way.

The things that typically cause C tubas to cost more (as we already know) are 5th rotors and lower production numbers...
...yet they are in somewhat heavy demand, as the parents of 17-year-olds buy “C tubas for kolij”, as their “extraordinarily talented” charges managed to make it into the back-ends of their local #2 honor bands, when in the 12th grade.

I view both my C tuba and my E-flat tuba as “fake” B-flat tubas, as both were clearly engineered to (as much as possible) mimic the sonic characteristics of large B-flat tubas as much as could be managed by their designers...
The “monster“ E-flat tubas - of the early 20th century - were designed for the very same purpose. (yes?)
My C instrument‘s advantage is that it responds a bit quicker - and with a bit more easily-accessible facility - than would an exact-equivalent B-flat, and the same with the E flat - except more so.
The “better for sharp keys/better for flat keys“ arguments/excuses are nonsense.

As more C instruments are designed from scratch - rather than being defacto factory cut-downs of B-flat models - intonation characteristics are improving with some newer models…but not with others (obviously: depending on the aural sensitivity of the design engineers, and/or a manufacturer’s willingness to - simply - “go with“ something that - in reality – is a failed design)...but a near-exact C equivalent of a B-flat is always going to resonate a little bit more - well... - “hollow“.

I might even go so far as to suggest that professional-grade 3/4-size B-flat and C tubas tend to serve some of their owners as “fake F tubas”...Back when I owned a model 184, that’s certainly how I used it. 😶

🤣😂😅
How’s THAT for a nice long post for all sorts of people to find all sorts of things with which they can disagree and argue?
It nearly qualifies as a troll, yes? Are “simply—stated truths”, often, the most well-executed trolls, anyway?
^^^There’s nothing to argue about. Troll on!
Welcome to Browntown!
Home of the Brown Note!
User avatar
jtm
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2020 2:51 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
Has thanked: 698 times
Been thanked: 209 times

Re: York versus York Master

Post by jtm »

bloke wrote: Tue Jan 26, 2021 7:57 am I might even go so far as to suggest that professional-grade 3/4-size B-flat and C tubas tend to serve some of their owners as “fake F tubas”...Back when I owned a model 184, that’s certainly how I used it. 😶
Reading some Bach cello suites today, as written, I agreed my C tuba was much too fake a fake F tuba. Maybe an 184 would be better, or maybe I should find a 180.
John Morris
This practicing trick actually seems to be working!
playing some old German rotary tubas for free
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 2472
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:48 am
Location: Downtown Browntown
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 767 times
Contact:

Re: York versus York Master

Post by Doc »

jtm wrote: Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:55 pm
bloke wrote: Tue Jan 26, 2021 7:57 am I might even go so far as to suggest that professional-grade 3/4-size B-flat and C tubas tend to serve some of their owners as “fake F tubas”...Back when I owned a model 184, that’s certainly how I used it. 😶
Reading some Bach cello suites today, as written, I agreed my C tuba was much too fake a fake F tuba. Maybe an 184 would be better, or maybe I should find a 180.
Once you can play it on Fake F Tuba, real F tuba should be no problem (provided you have a real F tuba).
Welcome to Browntown!
Home of the Brown Note!
User avatar
Three Valves
Posts: 4606
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 4:07 pm
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living
Has thanked: 814 times
Been thanked: 501 times

Re: York versus York Master

Post by Three Valves »

Buy an F-tuba and learn all new Shirt??

Or transpose arrangement. :huh:
Thought Criminal
Mack Brass Artiste
TU422L with TU25
1964 Conn 36k with CB Arnold Jacobs
Accent (By B&S) 952R with Bach12
The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column
Post Reply