Meinl-Weston/Melton model 54½50...??

Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
Post Reply
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19329
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3852 times
Been thanked: 4102 times

Meinl-Weston/Melton model 54½50...??

Post by bloke »

In a few days, I'll have some inside/outside tubing (two pairs of sizes, obviously) to extend my main tuning slide (on my model 5450) by a total of 11 inches or so...

...lengthening it to a B♮ tuba. :bugeyes:

Of course, this is just a couple of extensions, and nothing that can't be undone in a matter of seconds.

I just thought it might be fun to try a few low sharp-key orchestral excerpts on TRULY "an instrument that MIGHT?? play better in sharp keys".

I'll post in this thread about it later...


York-aholic
Posts: 1432
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
Location: SoCal
Has thanked: 1556 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Meinl-Weston/Melton model 54½50...??

Post by York-aholic »

Dare I ask what you’ve been drinking and in what quantities?

I might just want to stop by and join you!

:cheers:
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19329
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3852 times
Been thanked: 4102 times

Re: Meinl-Weston/Melton model 54½50...??

Post by bloke »

I would just like to see what the intonation characteristics are like, and - if “good“ - I’d like to run through a handful of low-tessitura sharp-keys excerpts, and see what it’s like to play them while mashing down fewer buttons.
These users thanked the author bloke for the post:
York-aholic (Sat Jul 31, 2021 9:10 am)
York-aholic
Posts: 1432
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
Location: SoCal
Has thanked: 1556 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Meinl-Weston/Melton model 54½50...??

Post by York-aholic »

Understood. It will be interesting to see what happens. As you say, quite easy mod to make the extenders.

I look forward to hearing what a foot of cylindrical tubing does. I’ve had a couple of old horns with extenders to bring a high pitch horn down to low pitch (less tubing obviously) but noticed no real difference in intonation or blow.

Less finger gymnastics would probably be nice.
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19329
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3852 times
Been thanked: 4102 times

Re: Meinl-Weston/Melton model 54½50...??

Post by bloke »

The prospect of playing “Der Walkürenritt” In the equivalent of “C Major on a C instrument” is somewhat a alluring.

As far as the additional cylindrical tubing in the main slide is concerned, most (all...??) of the fingerings to play those passages without it add that much additional cylindrical tubing, anyway.
These users thanked the author bloke for the post:
York-aholic (Sat Jul 31, 2021 11:54 am)
York-aholic
Posts: 1432
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
Location: SoCal
Has thanked: 1556 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Meinl-Weston/Melton model 54½50...??

Post by York-aholic »

bloke wrote: Sat Jul 31, 2021 9:30 am As far as the additional cylindrical tubing in the main slide is concerned, most (all...??) of the fingerings to play those passages without it add that much additional cylindrical tubing, anyway.
I suppose that should have occurred to me…
:smilie6:
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19329
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3852 times
Been thanked: 4102 times

Re: Meinl-Weston/Melton model 54½50...??

Post by bloke »

I’ve heard that it’s a lot easier to memorize textbooks than to think. 😉
Post Reply