This went fast. I didn't even have time to post the link before it was sold.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/325136272155
York BBb (sold)
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19342
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3854 times
- Been thanked: 4105 times
Re: York BBb (sold)
I realized immediately that those are rare and popular, but
- They're not to me personally.
- I have too many other projects.
- I just completed an epic B-flat project roughly a year ago.
- I immediately decided that an end user should be the acquirer.
- They're not to me personally.
- I have too many other projects.
- I just completed an epic B-flat project roughly a year ago.
- I immediately decided that an end user should be the acquirer.
- lost
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:38 am
- Location: Massachusetts
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
- Contact:
Re: York BBb (sold)
This is a big bore tuba. After 1921 or so they expanded the bores on their full size horns. Rare!
A front action version of this horn in lacquer just sold in Germany ebay, likely B&M.
A front action version of this horn in lacquer just sold in Germany ebay, likely B&M.
J.W. York & Sons Performing Artist
http://www.YorkLoyalist.com
http://www.YorkLoyalist.com
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19342
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3854 times
- Been thanked: 4105 times
Re: York BBb (sold)
Of course, the smaller ones continued to be made, but they never combined the 3/4” bore with the shorter model, did they?
… and the shorter model’s bell/bugle really weren’t much smaller – at all – than the taller model.
I believe those who have stepped up the bore size on the smaller model to .687” have found the magic combination. (Holton offered a nearly identical version - comparing with the York short model - throughout the decades - from the 1920’s all the way to “Phillips” - shortly before they were shuttered) that was always paired up with a .665” bore - roughly 1/100th of an inch larger than the York bore.) Those things having been said, I don’t believe that cutting either the shorter nor the taller version to C seems to be very successful, as far as creating an instrument that can be played as easily in tune as the unadulterated B-flat bugles.
… and the shorter model’s bell/bugle really weren’t much smaller – at all – than the taller model.
I believe those who have stepped up the bore size on the smaller model to .687” have found the magic combination. (Holton offered a nearly identical version - comparing with the York short model - throughout the decades - from the 1920’s all the way to “Phillips” - shortly before they were shuttered) that was always paired up with a .665” bore - roughly 1/100th of an inch larger than the York bore.) Those things having been said, I don’t believe that cutting either the shorter nor the taller version to C seems to be very successful, as far as creating an instrument that can be played as easily in tune as the unadulterated B-flat bugles.
- These users thanked the author bloke for the post:
- York-aholic (Fri Apr 08, 2022 9:37 pm)