For all the historians out there...recording bells?
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
- Dave Detwiler
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2020 4:12 pm
- Location: Harleysville, PA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 190 times
- Contact:
Re: For all the historians out there...recording bells?
Here's an interesting and highly relevant fact for this thread . . .
When C. G. Conn designed and patented the forward-facing bell for his low brass instruments in 1908, there was nothing said in the reports about them relating to how it would help with recording. Many benefits were mentioned, but not that one. And they were not called "recording bells" until sometime later.
For the details, here's my blog post on that: https://tubapastor.blogspot.com/2021/07 ... -1908.html
According to my research, Conn first called such a tuba a "Phonograph" model in 1921, and eventually a "Recording Bass" in 1928. Here are the specific models:
48-J (1921) New Wonder Phonograph CC
52-J (1926) Phonograph BBb
34/36-J (1928) De Luxe Recording Bass, BBb
When C. G. Conn designed and patented the forward-facing bell for his low brass instruments in 1908, there was nothing said in the reports about them relating to how it would help with recording. Many benefits were mentioned, but not that one. And they were not called "recording bells" until sometime later.
For the details, here's my blog post on that: https://tubapastor.blogspot.com/2021/07 ... -1908.html
According to my research, Conn first called such a tuba a "Phonograph" model in 1921, and eventually a "Recording Bass" in 1928. Here are the specific models:
48-J (1921) New Wonder Phonograph CC
52-J (1926) Phonograph BBb
34/36-J (1928) De Luxe Recording Bass, BBb
- These users thanked the author Dave Detwiler for the post (total 5):
- the elephant (Fri Jul 22, 2022 10:51 am) • tubanh84 (Fri Jul 22, 2022 11:29 am) • windshieldbug (Fri Jul 22, 2022 1:09 pm) • York-aholic (Fri Jul 22, 2022 4:34 pm) • groovlow (Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:14 pm)
Played an F. E. Olds 4-valve BBb in high school (late '70s)
Led the USC Trojan Marching Band tuba section (early '80s)
Now playing an F. Schmidt (=VMI) 3301 and goofing around
on a 1925 Pan American Sousaphone and an 1899 Conn tuba!
Led the USC Trojan Marching Band tuba section (early '80s)
Now playing an F. Schmidt (=VMI) 3301 and goofing around
on a 1925 Pan American Sousaphone and an 1899 Conn tuba!
-
- Posts: 1441
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 1573 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
Re: For all the historians out there...recording bells?
Interesting how similar the bugle (ignore the valve set) on that Holton that Conrad is playing looks compared to a York 700 series.
Then again, the Monster Eb tubas look quite similar between the two companies, as do their squat 4/4 BBb horns.
I’m not implying anything, I just don’t think I’d noticed a picture of a Holton ‘tall bell” 4/4 before.
Anyone have one that they could post a picture of or ever seen one in the flesh?
Then again, the Monster Eb tubas look quite similar between the two companies, as do their squat 4/4 BBb horns.
I’m not implying anything, I just don’t think I’d noticed a picture of a Holton ‘tall bell” 4/4 before.
Anyone have one that they could post a picture of or ever seen one in the flesh?
- These users thanked the author York-aholic for the post (total 2):
- LargeTuba (Fri Jul 22, 2022 5:37 pm) • bloke (Fri Jul 22, 2022 6:24 pm)
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19421
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3876 times
- Been thanked: 4140 times
Re: For all the historians out there...recording bells?
York/Holton… The more pictures and instruments show up and the more measuring that is done, the more suspect a tuba relationship between the two companies becomes.
Maybe, stay away from Holton, unless you want to soon end up dead.
Maybe, stay away from Holton, unless you want to soon end up dead.
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19421
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3876 times
- Been thanked: 4140 times
Re: For all the historians out there...recording bells?
I appreciate the picture of the recording session, and it is instructive.
It also indicates that only a few members of the band could probably crowd around those dozen or so machines – rather than the full band, and that – if 1000 black cylinders were sold for any given recorded song for instrumental piece – it would still need to be performed quite a few times, to meet demand.
It also indicates that only a few members of the band could probably crowd around those dozen or so machines – rather than the full band, and that – if 1000 black cylinders were sold for any given recorded song for instrumental piece – it would still need to be performed quite a few times, to meet demand.
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19421
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3876 times
- Been thanked: 4140 times
Re: For all the historians out there...recording bells?
I appreciate the picture of the recording session, and it is instructive.
It also indicates that only a few members of a large band - such as the Sousa band - could probably crowd around those dozen or so machines – rather than the full band, and that – if a-thousand-or-thousands of wax cylinders were sold for any given recorded song or instrumental piece – it would still need to be performed quite a few times (again: if there was no copying technology), to meet demand.
It also indicates that only a few members of a large band - such as the Sousa band - could probably crowd around those dozen or so machines – rather than the full band, and that – if a-thousand-or-thousands of wax cylinders were sold for any given recorded song or instrumental piece – it would still need to be performed quite a few times (again: if there was no copying technology), to meet demand.
Re: For all the historians out there...recording bells?
York-aholic wrote: ↑Fri Jul 22, 2022 11:07 am Interesting how similar the bugle (ignore the valve set) on that Holton that Conrad is playing looks compared to a York 700 series.
Then again, the Monster Eb tubas look quite similar between the two companies, as do their squat 4/4 BBb horns.
As documented in a previous post, a recent silver-plated Holton monster E flat I disassembled had the number “51” stamped on the branch where it is inside the ferrule….”51” is the model number for the York equivalent instrument.
I can’t think of any evidence that would be more convincing than that.
Re: For all the historians out there...recording bells?
Appropriately, Conrad appears to be playing a Conn New Wonder Phonograph, key uncertain.
https://simonettitubacollection.com/ins ... 4-pistons/
- Attachments
-
- 041C647E-CC4B-4454-8558-6DB9F4116B18.jpeg (41.32 KiB) Viewed 455 times
-
- 3D233C09-C91F-4D53-A561-10A0B7445452.jpeg (155.72 KiB) Viewed 455 times
- These users thanked the author Yorkboy for the post:
- York-aholic (Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:26 am)
-
- Posts: 1441
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 1573 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
Re: For all the historians out there...recording bells?
Yep, I'm not denying that in any way, shape, or form. I was just trying to steer clear and look specifically at the 'tall bell' versions.Yorkboy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:03 amYork-aholic wrote: ↑Fri Jul 22, 2022 11:07 am Interesting how similar the bugle (ignore the valve set) on that Holton that Conrad is playing looks compared to a York 700 series.
Then again, the Monster Eb tubas look quite similar between the two companies, as do their squat 4/4 BBb horns.
As documented in a previous post, a recent silver-plated Holton monster E flat I disassembled had the number “51” stamped on the branch where it is inside the ferrule….”51” is the model number for the York equivalent instrument.
I can’t think of any evidence that would be more convincing than that.
- These users thanked the author York-aholic for the post:
- Yorkboy (Fri Oct 14, 2022 6:45 pm)
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC
- Snake Charmer
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 8:49 am
- Location: Schifferstadt, Germany
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 69 times
Re: For all the historians out there...recording bells?
Wasn't there a "Pit Tuba" made by King in the 1930s? It was a slender but tall rotary horn with a normal sized adjustable front bell for the the use in orchestra pits to prevent blowing against the ceiling.The bell was high enough to blow over the heads of the orchestra.
...with a song in my heart!
-
- Posts: 1441
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 1573 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
Re: For all the historians out there...recording bells?
- These users thanked the author York-aholic for the post:
- Yorkboy (Mon Oct 17, 2022 12:53 pm)
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC