TU23

Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
Post Reply
User avatar
Mary Ann
Posts: 3039
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:24 am
Has thanked: 521 times
Been thanked: 598 times

TU23

Post by Mary Ann »

I was just told tonight that the JK 8C that I'm having great success with is a direct copy of a Miraphone TU 23 that they don't make any more. Can anybody verify this, and if so, what is the reputation / usual use of the TU23? (Nope not planning to look for one; just curious.)


donn
Posts: 1349
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:31 pm
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 169 times

Re: TU23

Post by donn »

The JK Exclusive line I'm looking at is a parameterized series. The number is cup width. "8" is 30.5mm (that actually falls off their current online chart, but luckily a retailer has an older chart.)

The letter is both depth and throat width. "C" is a depth between A = "very deep" and E = "shallowest", with a throat width of 8mm.

So if that's the story here, you have a narrow cup mouthpiece with a medium throat.

The TU23, a.k.a. "C4" in days of yore, is not only not the original model for this, it's more like the opposite. 32mm cup interior, 7.5mm throat. It's pretty markedly shallow bottomed, a rounded "bowl" profile, a point on which the JK info is silent but is not what I'd guess.

Some people like it. Not me.

I have liked the JK mouthpieces I've used, but as luck would have it, never had one from their tuba line.
Dents Be Gone!
Posts: 596
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2023 5:13 am
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 147 times

.

Post by Dents Be Gone! »

I agree, guys. This is the way to go.
Last edited by Dents Be Gone! on Wed May 01, 2024 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
donn
Posts: 1349
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:31 pm
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 169 times

Re: TU23

Post by donn »

Interesting, the cosmetic details are very similar - maybe that's what "direct copy" refers to. The pair of groove rings around the body, the knurling above the shank. If the picture is really a JK mouthpiece.

One difference that does appear in the photo, I forgot to mention, the C4/TU23 has a wide rim. May not be a giant difference - the arithmetic implied by the specs in that link makes the 8C 8.25mm, and I measure the C4 at 8.7mm.

There could be some Miraphone mouthpiece that's similar, maybe TU17 or something. Cup is supposed to be a little wider, but measurement technique could account for some of that. Direct copy, no.
Dents Be Gone!
Posts: 596
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2023 5:13 am
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 147 times

.

Post by Dents Be Gone! »

I agree, guys. This is the way to go.
Last edited by Dents Be Gone! on Wed May 01, 2024 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
These users thanked the author Dents Be Gone! for the post:
donn (Thu Sep 28, 2023 5:30 am)
hrender
Posts: 1910
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:18 am
Has thanked: 612 times
Been thanked: 299 times

Re: TU23

Post by hrender »

The Miraphone TU23 (formerly C4) is still made so far as I can tell. Local stock is a different issue. I have seen them for sale used. I played one many years ago on a Yamaha YBB-641, and it was a good match for that horn. I've thought about trying one on the horns I have now, but I'm generally happy with the pieces I use for them.
User avatar
Mary Ann
Posts: 3039
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:24 am
Has thanked: 521 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: TU23

Post by Mary Ann »

donn wrote: Thu Sep 28, 2023 1:30 am The JK Exclusive line I'm looking at is a parameterized series. The number is cup width. "8" is 30.5mm (that actually falls off their current online chart, but luckily a retailer has an older chart.)

The letter is both depth and throat width. "C" is a depth between A = "very deep" and E = "shallowest", with a throat width of 8mm.

So if that's the story here, you have a narrow cup mouthpiece with a medium throat.

The TU23, a.k.a. "C4" in days of yore, is not only not the original model for this, it's more like the opposite. 32mm cup interior, 7.5mm throat. It's pretty markedly shallow bottomed, a rounded "bowl" profile, a point on which the JK info is silent but is not what I'd guess.

Some people like it. Not me.

I have liked the JK mouthpieces I've used, but as luck would have it, never had one from their tuba line.
Thanks and that fits with my memory of using a C4. I found it wide, didn't have enough sharpness to the rim, and it seemed like my face just fell into it. I don't remember the shallowness "level" but do remember that it seemed shallow. That was very early on so I don't remember more than that. I think I was trying it on my then MW F182.
donn
Posts: 1349
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:31 pm
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 169 times

Re: TU23

Post by donn »

Does the 8C cup profile contour seem to lean towards a right angle at the bottom with the throat, or at the top with the rim, or is it good and conical at both ends?
Post Reply