443 vs 440 instruments
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
-
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2021 11:12 am
- Location: Meadville, PA
- Has thanked: 252 times
- Been thanked: 259 times
443 vs 440 instruments
If one buys a European tuba from the usual sources (notably Miraphone), the specs will often say A=443. I have read here that A=440 is a longer main tuning slide. Some stores say they “special order” A=440 instruments “for the American market”. Some questions: why is just replacing one slide with another a “special order”? Why don’t they just put on the longer slide if they know the instrument is going to America? And with such a small difference, isn’t it possible to tune to A=440 even if you have the 443 slide? And when they come up with the tuning spec, is it with the MTS all the way in? Or partially pulled out? Thanks. Been wondering about this for a long time.
King 2341 “new style”
Kanstul 902-3B
Conn Helleberg Standard 120
Kanstul 902-3B
Conn Helleberg Standard 120
- jtm
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2020 2:51 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Has thanked: 700 times
- Been thanked: 209 times
Re: 443 vs 440 instruments
The length difference for a BBb tuba is less than 4cm. So if you have 2cm of room left to pull out the main tuning slide, then you're good to play at 440. I'd guess that nobody mentions the other tuning slides because they'll all need proportionally less adjustment, like 12mm for 4th, and less for the others.
John Morris
This practicing trick actually seems to be working!
playing some old German rotary tubas for free
This practicing trick actually seems to be working!
playing some old German rotary tubas for free
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19369
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3858 times
- Been thanked: 4118 times
Re: 443 vs 440 instruments
My Miraphone 98 tuba has the same "443" jazz on it's specs. I had to remove over an inch (probably about 1-1/2 inches...ie. 4cm) total about 2cm off of each of the main slide ferrules) to get it to safely play UP TO 440.
As it was, I MIGHT HAVE played up to 440 if the room was 70 - 72 degrees, and I had been playing on the thing for at least five minutes.
I now have (FULLY WARMED UP, which SELDOM is the case) about a 5/8" pull (1-1/4 inches total lengthening) for 440.
Typical (orchestral playing, lots of rests, etc...) the main slide is pulled 3/8 of an inch.
players:
I notice that a whole bunch of players use extra-deep mouthpieces (rather than generous teeth-spacing/mouth cavity size) for a so-called "round" sound.
I'm probably doing it wrong.
I played the Star Wars - Main Title (constant playing on that piece, as is known) this morning (two shows - Memphis school kiddies) with the Symphony.
With wall-to-wall loud playing such as that, I went ahead and pulled the slide out the 5/8".
ALSO (with the tuba a bit longer like that) it kept my downbeat low B-flat "honest".
I guess all I'm really saying is that after chopping off well over an inch from a Miraphone so-called 443 instrument, it's now just short enough to be maybe a 442 instrument.
As it was, I MIGHT HAVE played up to 440 if the room was 70 - 72 degrees, and I had been playing on the thing for at least five minutes.
I now have (FULLY WARMED UP, which SELDOM is the case) about a 5/8" pull (1-1/4 inches total lengthening) for 440.
Typical (orchestral playing, lots of rests, etc...) the main slide is pulled 3/8 of an inch.
players:
I notice that a whole bunch of players use extra-deep mouthpieces (rather than generous teeth-spacing/mouth cavity size) for a so-called "round" sound.
I'm probably doing it wrong.
I played the Star Wars - Main Title (constant playing on that piece, as is known) this morning (two shows - Memphis school kiddies) with the Symphony.
With wall-to-wall loud playing such as that, I went ahead and pulled the slide out the 5/8".
ALSO (with the tuba a bit longer like that) it kept my downbeat low B-flat "honest".
I guess all I'm really saying is that after chopping off well over an inch from a Miraphone so-called 443 instrument, it's now just short enough to be maybe a 442 instrument.
- Doc
- Posts: 2472
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:48 am
- Location: Downtown Browntown
- Has thanked: 846 times
- Been thanked: 767 times
- Contact:
Re: 443 vs 440 instruments
My 496 came with two tuning slides. I use the short one, as I tend to play low (most likely attributed to my big mouth).
Welcome to Browntown!
Home of the Brown Note!
Home of the Brown Note!
Re: 443 vs 440 instruments
Players with good sound production play with less tuning slide. Tension makes makes the pitch go up a lot. The most resonance is in the bottom of the slot.