Re: Bort's Rudy Meinl 5/4 BBb (it is here!)
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 3:06 pm
Tuba & euphonium forum, message board, and community.
https://mail.tubaforum.net/
Thanks for the photos and the compliment!
I've noticed this on many old RM's.
bort2.0 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 07, 2022 10:49 pm From my earliest days of playing the tuba, I remember looking up what little tuba information was on the Internet. I remember seeing Rudy Meinl tubas, and -- no lie -- listing over the 5/4 BBb. It just had the physical appearance that caught my eye and stuck with me.
YEP!Sousaswag wrote: ↑Fri Apr 08, 2022 6:02 am With the pedal BBb, I wonder if mouthpiece choice may help. On these big horns, using a huge mouthpiece may not be the way to go. I’m not 100% convinced I’ll play the Pt-50 forever on my MRP, but it’s the best choice I’ve got right now. I’ve been told a Geib mouthpiece might be a good idea on a large rotary instrument. Maybe give one of those a whack and see what it does?
Oh, I'm sure there are some quirks; I've had the tuba only for a few days, but nothing particularly sticks out to me, except (same as 4-valve CC tubas) needing either different fingerings or a little slide stuff for the very very low range. That's just a mathematical reality.Rick Denney wrote: ↑Fri Apr 08, 2022 11:11 am I’m surprised you aren’t finding a few intonation quirks. Rudi’s are known for a sharp sixth partial, for example. Maybe that’s just the C versions.
The classic Rudi bell has a tightish curve mid-flare and then a somewhat straighter section between there and the rim flare. I firmly believe that is part of the Rudi Meinl formula. I think some orchestra dudes in the day thought of them as substitutes for the rare Alexander tubas that had good (read: manageable) intonation, but to me they have their own brand of power that is appealing. I find a 5/4 RM to be more playable than an Alex 164, based on the 42 seconds I had with one of the latter years ago. :)
Thankfully, my RM 5/4 has been refitted with a Miraphone 190 leadpipe, which you've told me is smaller than the stock Rudy pipe. I've never done an A/B test to compare old to new, obviously, but whatever is there now both plays well and looks nice in nickel silver. Curiously enough, the Alex 163 CC that I traded away for this tuba ALSO had been refit (independently) with a Miraphone 190 leadpipe.bloke wrote: ↑Fri Apr 08, 2022 12:37 pm My 5/4 (defacto 6/4) RM C behaved(s) itself better than all of the other (the various .750"/19mm bore, as the RM 5/4 is a 22mm bore instrument) 6/4's that I previously owned.
I only played a B-flat RM 5/4 for a week or so (after repairing it for a customer), but I seem to recall (though I didn't have it long enough to grow accustomed to it's vacuum-cleaner tendencies) that it wasn't troublesome (in the tuning dept.) at all.
That having been said, it was a (comparatively, to the badged one - discussed in this thread) modern-era version.
If you remember my pre-coup-era thread about interchangeable capillary portions of RM 5/4 C mouthpipes, I believe that the CURRENT (oem) versions might more resemble the one that I made for that instrument (ref: old-style "vacuum-cleaner" tendencies).