Just saw this... what do you all think?
https://www.willson.ch/en/content/news/caidex-valve
Willson CAIDEX valve
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
-
windshieldbug
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 1:02 pm
- Location: 8 vb
- Has thanked: 325 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Re: Willson CAIDEX valve
Makes sense... a full rotary with the sealing area less than an Allen “pinched” rotary.
Why not go all the way and combine the two for even less mass!?
Why not go all the way and combine the two for even less mass!?
If it’s tourist season, why can’t we shoot them?
-
bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19321
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3852 times
- Been thanked: 4101 times
Re: Willson CAIDEX valve
As with other rotors which...
- feature a diameter considerably LESS THAN 2X the bore diameter, and
- feature round entrances/exits,
it seems to me that the material (marked off between the two parallel black lines unnecessarily adds weight (and the worst type: circumferential) and unnecessarily chokes down the bore even more than does a run-of-the-mill rotor.
...and yes, I understand that the lines I drew should have been curved, etc., etc...
bloke "...or maybe, I don't 'get it'...??"
- feature a diameter considerably LESS THAN 2X the bore diameter, and
- feature round entrances/exits,
it seems to me that the material (marked off between the two parallel black lines unnecessarily adds weight (and the worst type: circumferential) and unnecessarily chokes down the bore even more than does a run-of-the-mill rotor.
...and yes, I understand that the lines I drew should have been curved, etc., etc...
bloke "...or maybe, I don't 'get it'...??"
-
groovlow
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 5:05 pm
- Location: Nashville
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
Re: Willson CAIDEX valve
Air flow similar to a piston?. Wonder if half [partial] valving effects are usable?
Pistons are very forgiving when fingering less than 100% accuracy.
When I play my rotor horns I hear my inaccurate piston fingers. Makes me focus on right hand [microseconds]timing. It takes a few sessions to become automatic.
Conversely going to piston horns from rotors, my precision is sort of on top of the beat and cleaner than usual.
Joe H
Pistons are very forgiving when fingering less than 100% accuracy.
When I play my rotor horns I hear my inaccurate piston fingers. Makes me focus on right hand [microseconds]timing. It takes a few sessions to become automatic.
Conversely going to piston horns from rotors, my precision is sort of on top of the beat and cleaner than usual.
Joe H
-
bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19321
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3852 times
- Been thanked: 4101 times
Re: Willson CAIDEX valve
Unless the routing is 3D, it seems to me that it's virtually a physical impossibility for the bore (through a rotor body that isn't even 2X the bore size, in diameter) to not be compressed into an ellipse (typically with a flat side on the exterior wall...ie. sort-of a "D" shape), and - if material is left on the exterior wall as part of the rotor body itself - the ellipse must then be even more compressed.