Rotary Kalison DS CC tuba

Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
Post Reply
User avatar
bort2.0
Posts: 5254
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:13 am
Location: Minneapolis
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 999 times

Rotary Kalison DS CC tuba

Post by bort2.0 »

Did this version actually ever exist in the real world? Or is this photo (er... drawing?) the only evidence of it?

Image

http://www.kalison.at/c-tuba/c-tuba_6001.php


User avatar
jtm
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2020 2:51 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
Has thanked: 698 times
Been thanked: 209 times

Re: Rotary Kalison DS CC tuba

Post by jtm »

You've killed their site.
I love the way that 4th valve circuit looks, even it there may be other reasons not to do it like that.
John Morris
This practicing trick actually seems to be working!
playing some old German rotary tubas for free
User avatar
cktuba
Posts: 231
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:57 am
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Rotary Kalison DS CC tuba

Post by cktuba »

These did exist. I believe the first Kalisons in this country were rotary. I've heard the original rotary versions of the CC weren't very good. But I never got to play one.

When I went to the Kalison factory to pick up my Pro 2000 in the mid-90's they did not have any rotary CCs. But they did have a rotary F that I really liked. I remember the rotars having a short throw and being very fast. I would have liked to try one of these.
User avatar
the elephant
Posts: 3391
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:39 am
Location: 404 - Not Found
Has thanked: 1899 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Rotary Kalison DS CC tuba

Post by the elephant »

I played one in 1990. I did not like it enough to look into getting one. In 1993 I stumbled across Paul K's piston DS, which was marked Prototype #2 and used a different piston set than the production horns used. I loved that tuba and bought it that day.

The piston horns were the better of the two this one time. (I generally find that the rotary versions play with better intonation when there is a horn with both valves available. I do not like the piston Neptune at all, but I *love* the rotary horn, as an example.)

If you could locate a not-too-far-away example of this model to test I would make the effort as they were pretty good. I would NOT buy one sight unseen. The 23 combo was STINKY on the one I tried. It was a little squirrelly on the piston horn I bought, too, but not unmanageable. The dreaded Kalison high Ab was a major issue on the rotary horn example I played, whereas my piston DS did not have the issue at all.

The build quality of these is not great. Everything feels a little cheap and the plating comes off. Tube ends are sharp, internal joints are not always cleanly done, and tube ends are cut crookedly. Joints tend to have large gaps. I think this is why these did not sell more. You could get a really great horn, but it was just as likely that you did not. They were a lot like Chinese horns today, in that one regard: inconsistent.

If you are tire kicking, consider kicking this one down the road. The piston horn was much more popular even in the days when rotary horns were still keeping up with piston horns in popularity. That ought to say something about this model…

Cheers!
These users thanked the author the elephant for the post:
tubatodd (Mon Apr 05, 2021 6:28 pm)
Image
Post Reply