trolling tubaforum re: old handmade/sheet metal Miraphone model 86 tubas with 420mm bell diameter
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 4:11 pm
When I see old Miraphone (Mirafone) model 86 C tubas for sale, I'm noticing that most of the 4-valve ones aren't as ragged out as the 5-valve ones.
Since most people
(other than argumentative sticks-in-the-mud, who argue for the "old length" 5th valve circuit - EVEN THOUGH they have absolutely NO PLANS to buy a Miraphone tuba with EITHER length of 5th circuit)
prefer the "GG whole step" 5th valve circuit length,
(particularly as long as the mouthpipe tube is of the 1970's-and-beyond style, which features a couple of inches of straight pipe before the #1 rotor)
might it be a better strategy to look at the old sheet metal 420mm bell diameter FOUR-VALVE versions of the model 86 C, and then add one's own preferred 5th rotor config', along with (most likely) a right-hand thumb lever...
...ie. RATHER THAN paying more for a (more rare) 5-valve vintage model 86 C, and (most likely) STILL having to convert it to suit one's own preferences...??
Now that the new thickwall/hydraulically-formed 450mm bell diameter ones are over ten grand, doesn't that offer a bit of leeway to purchase a darn-good-condition older 4-valve smaller-bell-diameter HANDMADE one, one's choice of 5th valve parts, and labor to install those parts (plus some dent removal, tightening up, and general clean-up)?
Again (as the point I attempted to make - above - may have been lost in all my trolling rhetoric)...
SO MANY OF THE OLD >> 4-VALVE << HANDMADE 420mm-BELL MODEL 86 TUBAS SEEM TO NOT BE SO "RODE HARD AND PUT AWAY WET".
As a postscript, a FEW people might actually PREFER a FOUR-valve version, and to teach themselves the "pull the #4 slide" (which is purposefully LONG and ACCESSIBLE on the C-version) system.
Since most people
(other than argumentative sticks-in-the-mud, who argue for the "old length" 5th valve circuit - EVEN THOUGH they have absolutely NO PLANS to buy a Miraphone tuba with EITHER length of 5th circuit)
prefer the "GG whole step" 5th valve circuit length,
(particularly as long as the mouthpipe tube is of the 1970's-and-beyond style, which features a couple of inches of straight pipe before the #1 rotor)
might it be a better strategy to look at the old sheet metal 420mm bell diameter FOUR-VALVE versions of the model 86 C, and then add one's own preferred 5th rotor config', along with (most likely) a right-hand thumb lever...
...ie. RATHER THAN paying more for a (more rare) 5-valve vintage model 86 C, and (most likely) STILL having to convert it to suit one's own preferences...??
Now that the new thickwall/hydraulically-formed 450mm bell diameter ones are over ten grand, doesn't that offer a bit of leeway to purchase a darn-good-condition older 4-valve smaller-bell-diameter HANDMADE one, one's choice of 5th valve parts, and labor to install those parts (plus some dent removal, tightening up, and general clean-up)?
Again (as the point I attempted to make - above - may have been lost in all my trolling rhetoric)...
SO MANY OF THE OLD >> 4-VALVE << HANDMADE 420mm-BELL MODEL 86 TUBAS SEEM TO NOT BE SO "RODE HARD AND PUT AWAY WET".
As a postscript, a FEW people might actually PREFER a FOUR-valve version, and to teach themselves the "pull the #4 slide" (which is purposefully LONG and ACCESSIBLE on the C-version) system.