(At least in the USA) we (musicians) need rich people.

Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
Post Reply
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19367
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3857 times
Been thanked: 4118 times

(At least in the USA) we (musicians) need rich people.

Post by bloke »

Whether it's N.E.A (Nat. Endow. Arts...no: not the teachers union), orchestra seating ($1XX - $2XX) ticket sales, or significant contributions, got-no-money people do very little to subsidize most of the types of music that most of us (who visit this particular site) play.

Even our community bands/orchestras usually need subsidizing (significantly more expenses accumulate beyond "band dues").

Wealthier people (and please don't suggest that they do not, as I'll ask for the thread to be deleted, if such epic nonsense is injected) pay most of the taxes and do most of $1XX+ ticket-buying and $XXXX+ contributing.

When properous people become targets (such as "always") they tend to (just as any of us would, trying to protect our property) give away less...and - when they do contribute less, the FIRST thing they're probably going to STOP giving to is "those oddballs who play classical music and jazz" - while continuing to give to hospitals and other things that (obviously should) take precedence over giving to "some people playing some tunes".

I'm ONLY encouraging musicians (who live off the contributions of those - whether via taxation or direct contributions - who >> THEY THEMSELVES MAY WELL NOT EVEN PARTICULARLY LIKE THE MUSIC THAT WE PLAY) to go easy on the "soak the rich" political rhetoric (and particularly when identifying oneself as "a member of the arts community"). Any musicians (who rely on public or private contributions - and that includes amateur groups that receive contributions to cover heavy expenses) are being (yes: artificially, as the actual market is non-existent) propped up - in their ability to do what they do - by wealthy people...and I'm referring to the constantly-targeted SIGNIFICANTLY wealthy people.

Even the single-digit millionaires are having trouble keeping up with everything costing double/triple, so (other than - maybe...?? - buying balcony tickets (etc.) we can forget about them kicking in any significant dough, as well.

If you TOTALLY disagree with EVERYTHING posted here, maybe (at least?) think about it, eh?

btw...I know quite a few over-the-top socialists/progressives (etc.) who DO get this, and ARE polite/nice/etc. to wealthy/generous patrons.


Image
There goes bloke again...POLITICS :bugeyes: :slap: :wall:
STOP your ranting about stuff that ACTUALLY matters and musicians being supported effectively/adequately, and go back to talking about the second strain of "Black Horse Troop" !!!
These users thanked the author bloke for the post (total 2):
Doc (Tue Feb 27, 2024 4:12 pm) • prairieboy1 (Tue Feb 27, 2024 8:14 pm)


User avatar
Three Valves
Posts: 4613
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 4:07 pm
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living
Has thanked: 817 times
Been thanked: 505 times

Re: (At least in the USA) we (musicians) need rich people.

Post by Three Valves »

I can say this for them.

They throw nice parties!

:smilie7:
Thought Criminal
Mack Brass Artiste
TU422L with TU25
1964 Conn 36k with CB Arnold Jacobs
Accent (By B&S) 952R with Bach12
The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column
Post Reply