Another Mic Placement Trial - Comments Welcomed

Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
Post Reply
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 2472
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:48 am
Location: Downtown Browntown
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 767 times
Contact:

Another Mic Placement Trial - Comments Welcomed

Post by Doc »

As well all know, mic placement for tuba can be a challenge, especially in a room with less than desirable acoustics. Without modifying the room, adding foam panels, mic shrouds, buying $XXXX microphones, etc., and with your continued help, I’m narrowing in on it.

In this session, I started off at 6ft (previous starting reference), then moved very close, about 1ft away. All examples with the mic under the bell level and the mic pointed slightly below horizontal.

Thanks to everyone for their comments and suggestions!



Welcome to Browntown!
Home of the Brown Note!
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19369
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3858 times
Been thanked: 4119 times

Re: Another Mic Placement Trial - Comments Welcomed

Post by bloke »

I - lazily - set my phone on my music stand to (albeit rarely) record things, and - though my phone mic is crap, compared to that one - the sound is the MOST similar to your "one foot away under the bell" type of sound.

Some of the other set-ups offered more "front".

They all sound like "an 8-10-feet ceiling" (to my ears).
These users thanked the author bloke for the post:
Doc (Sun Jan 23, 2022 7:15 am)
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 2472
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:48 am
Location: Downtown Browntown
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 767 times
Contact:

Re: Another Mic Placement Trial - Comments Welcomed

Post by Doc »

bloke wrote: Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:45 am They all sound like "an 8-10-feet ceiling" (to my ears).
Dealing with that may require acoustic foam panels, or something else. For now, I’ll make the best out it.

If, of course, I win the lotto, I’ll build a room/hall sufficient for such recording. If, of course, I ever bought a lotto ticket, I’d have a chance to win the lotto. Maybe I ought to buy a lotto ticket this decade… this century…?
Welcome to Browntown!
Home of the Brown Note!
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19369
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3858 times
Been thanked: 4119 times

Re: Another Mic Placement Trial - Comments Welcomed

Post by bloke »

How much padding is in the headliner of your squad car?

😉
These users thanked the author bloke for the post:
Doc (Sat Jan 22, 2022 9:36 pm)
User avatar
GC
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 2:53 pm
Location: Rome, GA [Rosedale/Armuchee suburbs]
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: Another Mic Placement Trial - Comments Welcomed

Post by GC »

Maybe I'm belaboring the obvious, but the mike sets at 1 foot capture much more resonance than the 6' ones, and less overtone. I think the close set is actually picking up the fatness from body resonance rather than how it projects into the room. Both sound good, but if you're after clarity instead of fatness, I'd pick the 6' sets. If you want tonal booty, go close. Also, how high the mike is (closeness to the bell) in the close position will make a big difference in capture of overtones.

Also with the distant set, resonance picks up as you approach the higher register but stays pretty consistent close up with the close set. I'm thinking this may be a matter of room acoustics and a resonant point of the space.

Either way, you really sound great on the JP377.
Last edited by GC on Sat Jan 22, 2022 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These users thanked the author GC for the post:
Doc (Sat Jan 22, 2022 9:36 pm)
Packer/Sterling JP377 compensating Eb; Mercer & Barker MBUZ5 (Tim Buzbee "Lone ☆ Star" F-tuba mouthpiece), Mercer & Barker MB3; for sale: Conn Monster Eb 1914, Fillmore Bros 1/4 Eb ca. 1905 antique (still plays), Bach 42B trombone
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 2472
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:48 am
Location: Downtown Browntown
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 767 times
Contact:

Re: Another Mic Placement Trial - Comments Welcomed

Post by Doc »

bloke wrote: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:14 pm How much padding is in the headliner of your squad car?

😉
Damned little! And everything behind the cage, including the seats, is hard plastic and metal. Very tuba-friendly…
Welcome to Browntown!
Home of the Brown Note!
User avatar
matt g
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:37 am
Location: Southeastern New England
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 555 times

Re: Another Mic Placement Trial - Comments Welcomed

Post by matt g »

A good short article on the proximity effect:

https://www.neumann.com/homestudio/en/w ... ity-effect
These users thanked the author matt g for the post:
Doc (Sat Jan 22, 2022 9:35 pm)
Dillon/Walters CC (sold)
Meinl-Weston 2165 (sold)
User avatar
Jperry1466
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:13 am
Location: near Fort Worth, Texas
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Another Mic Placement Trial - Comments Welcomed

Post by Jperry1466 »

Very nice playing! To me, the 1 ft. proximity was just a more "satisfying" sound in both examples. And that's as scientific as I'm going to get.
These users thanked the author Jperry1466 for the post:
Doc (Sat Jan 22, 2022 9:35 pm)
Beyond16
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2021 9:08 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Another Mic Placement Trial - Comments Welcomed

Post by Beyond16 »

Wow, your playing is so perfect and your tone is so mellow. Those high notes sound effortless. All your mic locations give good results. I have been experimenting with mic location because my tone is bad, sometimes shockingly bad.

We changed our house from all carpet to all hard flooring. Now the sound is terrible. I can hardly understand the children talking. Now I feel like a homeless person living in a parking garage. The echo is ridiculous. We have no rugs and no soft furniture beyond a sofa. One room is huge. I practice in an ordinary sized room. The echo is so bad, I wear these earmuffs when practicing.

For the small room, I get best results with the bell pointed towards the mic, and be maybe 3 feet or closer. For the big room, the echo is a little more acceptable because of the open feel. But it's still excessive to me, so I think pointing the bell towards the mic is best.

But my needs are different than yours. There are a couple of problems with my playing that can be somewhat minimized with mic placement. One is the attacks on the notes are not clean. There is a momentary hiss of air. The other problem is tone on high notes. I have been trying to improve tone for months. I believe my high note tone problem is due to pulling my lips back against my teeth to get the note to play. I am trying to learn to play those notes without relying on the teeth so much. I also need to separate my teeth more, but I think lip strength needs to improve for that. I bet you can benchpress 350 with your lips.

I am using a fairly cheap mic, but it's very accurate. I can actually pick up a signal from a 90 KHz tone. I don't think I can make any significant improvement by switching mics.

My Yamaha YBB-104 is smaller than your Bb, but I am certain it would sound amazing if someone like you played it. It has no major unrepaired dents. Today I pressured tested it using a low pressure regulator and flowmeter. Sealing off the bell was a pain. But the leakage rate is as low and an exceptionally good trumpet, even though the valves are bigger. Soapy water confirmed no leakage anywhere beyond the tiny valve seepage.

So that leaves my lips. I think they need time to gain strength and flexibility. Anyway, I made some recordings with different mic placements. Pretty amazing the different range of resulting sounds.

For low notes, I played a few bars from Hogan's Heroes March. Here are the variations:
1) Mic dropped all the way down into the bell crook. Volume reduced because of excessive bass.
2) Mic in bell, 4 inches below rim.
3) Mic level with bell.
4) Mic above bell (4 inches).
5) Mic above bell (8 inches).
6) Mic above bell (36 inches).
7) Chunk of carpet over bell, mic 4 inches away.
8) Mic on floor (still in small room).
9) Big room, mike far away.

For high(er) notes, I played a few bars from Mexican Hat Dance. Here are the variations:
1) Mic dropped all the way down into the bell crook (kind of loud).
2) Mic halfway down bell.
3) Mic in bell, 4 inches below rim.
4) Mic level with bell.
5) Mic above bell (4 inches).
6) Mic above bell (8 inches).
7) Mic above bell (36 inches).
8) Mic on floor (still in small room).
9) Big room, mike far away.
10) Big room, bell pointed toward mic (horn sideways and hard to play).
11) Same as 9 above, but filtered with 'sox lowpass -1 1000'.

Some of those samples sound like I am just buzzing the mouthpiece. But I swear the tuba was attached for all of them.

Filtering seems like a way to hide problems, so I'm not too excited to improve my tone by that method. But lowpass filtering does help remove the hiss from airy attacks, and also removes high overtones that give the buzzing sound to high notes.
These users thanked the author Beyond16 for the post:
Doc (Sun Jan 23, 2022 7:02 am)
Post Reply